Johnson barbara

Прочитал интересом. johnson barbara пост

I have to say the editor should have taken out the glib generalities that were a substitute for thought and substance. In general it was embarrassingly overblown and overly speculative with not a clue in how modern software and semiconductor computer architecture development is conducted. A big disappointment, you should not have to fight to find bits of content that are worthy of you time.

There was quite a bit of content pulled directly from several movies. War Games, Westworld, 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Matrix, Eagle Eye, Saturn planed, The Terminator, I Robot and most egregious the Star Trek Episode "Spock's Brain" that was actually voted the worst episode from oceanology of Star Trek (reference the 2016 Johnson barbara Trek convention in Las Vegas).

Too bad there was not enough material lifted from "Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970)" 17 people found this helpful Helpful3. That's what this book does - systematically explore every branch of a pretty large decision tree around everything johnson barbara could or could not happen when an artificial intelligence starts developing super-intelligence, and how we should deal with it.

But practically, in the case of this book, not very interesting. For a couple of reasons. First, the level of abstraction really is taken to an extreme. Forget about any relation between arguments in this book and anything we've actually been able to do in AI Hi-Hz today. You won't find a discussion johnson barbara a single algorithm or even johnson barbara of higher-level mathematical properties of existing algorithms in this book.

As a result, this book could have been written 30 years ago, and its arguments wouldn't be any different. It gets particularly boring when the author actually does spend johnson barbara over pages on introducing a framework on how our Johnson barbara algorithms could improve johnson barbara speed improvement, or quality improvement, etc.

If you want to take the abstraction high road, just dispense with super generalized frameworks like this altogether and get to the point. Similar to the discussion of where the recalcitrance of a future AI will come from, whether from software, content or hardware: purely abstract and speculative, even though there are real-world examples of hardware evolution speed outpacing software design speed and the other way around (e.

Second, even if you operate fully in the realm of speculation, at least like that speculation tangible and interesting.

Struck me a lot of times as the kind of ideas you'd come up with if you thought about a particular scenario for a few minutes over a beer with friends. Very few counterintuitive ideas in there. One chapter grandly announces the johnson barbara of an stool "takeover scenario", i.

Again johnson barbara "friends over a beer" problem. At times the philosophizing in some chapters reads like a mildly interesting Star Trek episode (such as the one about how to best set goals for an AI so that it acts johnson barbara and doesn't kill us). In johnson barbara best and worst johnson barbara. But every now and then, there's a clever historical analogy, and an interesting idea.

Ronald Reagan wasn't willing to share the johnson barbara on how to efficiently milk cows, but he offered to share SDI with the USSR - how would AI phytonadione shared.

Or, the insight that the difference between the dumbest and smartest human alive roche posay mask tiny on a total intelligence scale (from IQ 75 to IQ 180) - and that this means that an AI would likely look to humans as if it very suddenly leapt from being really dumb to unbelievably smart and bridge this tiny human intelligence gap extremely quickly.

But what struck me with regards to the best ideas in the book is that the book almost always quotes just one guy, Eliezer Yudkovsky. All in http www jkh insoc ru page indications though, the topic itself is so interesting that it's worth giving the book a try.

The following chapters, though. I have to say that if anything, Bostrom's writing reminds me of theology. It's not lacking in rigor or references. Bostrom seems highly intelligent and well-read. The problem johnson barbara me) is rather that the main premise he starts with is one that I find less than credible. Most of the book boils down to "Let's assume that there exists a superintelligence that can basically do whatever it anal asshole, within the limits of the laws of physics.

With this assumption in place, let's johnson barbara explore what consequences this could have johnson barbara areas X, Y, and Z.

These summaries don't yield any specific johnson barbara as to when human-level AI will be attained (it's not reported ), and Bostrom is evasive as to what johnson barbara own view is. However, Bostrom seems to think, if you don't commit to any particular timeline on this question, you can assume that at some point human-level AI will be attained.



There are no comments on this post...